Telescope Magnification Charts
Marc Stowbridge
I do not have a very good memory, and math-on-the-fly was never
my strong suit. Consequently, I needed a crib sheet when asked by
eager young astronomers “What Power is your telescope?”
The WORKS template below produces charts that suitable for laminating
to the telescope, and providing a quick answer. It’s also
useful when choosing what eyepiece to use given the size of various
deep space objects. |
|
|
| Eyepiece Chart for LX-90 |
|
|
Aperture= |
203.2 |
| f/= |
10 |
@50/in.:
|
Max
Power = |
415 |
| focal
length |
2000.0 |
True
Field |
Mag. |
True
Field |
| Eyepiece |
Mag. |
Deg
- min |
Barlow
X2 |
Deg
- min |
| 4 |
500 |
0.06 |
1000 |
0.03 |
| 6.4 |
313 |
0.10 |
625 |
0.05 |
| 9.7 |
206 |
0.15 |
412 |
0.08 |
| 12.4 |
161 |
0.19 |
323 |
0.10 |
| 15 |
133 |
0.23 |
267 |
0.12 |
| 20 |
100 |
0.31 |
200 |
0.16 |
| 26 |
77 |
0.41 |
154 |
0.20 |
| 32 |
63 |
0.50 |
125 |
0.25 |
| f/= |
6.3 |
(using a Reducer-Corrector) |
|
|
| focal
length |
1280.16 |
True
Field |
Mag. |
True
Field |
| Eyepiece |
Mag. |
Deg
- min |
Barlow
X2 |
Deg
- min |
| 4 |
320 |
0.10 |
640 |
0.05 |
| 6.4 |
200 |
0.16 |
400 |
0.08 |
| 9.7 |
132 |
0.24 |
264 |
0.12 |
| 12.4 |
103 |
0.30 |
206 |
0.15 |
| 15 |
85 |
0.37 |
171 |
0.18 |
| 20 |
64 |
0.49 |
128 |
0.24 |
| 26 |
49 |
1.03 |
98 |
0.32 |
| 32 |
40 |
1.18 |
80 |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The template gives instructions about where to enter
data, and provides 3 models of complete charts. These are for the
ETX-125, LX90 and GT 114. The template can be modified for most
any telescope and eyepiece combination, as long as you know: 1)
the focal length (in mm); 2) the f/ ratio; 3) the aperture (diameter
in mm) of the telescope; and 4) the eyepiece focal length and the
apparent field of view. Most of these figures will be on the telescope
or eyepiece, except for the AFV, which is often available on the
manufacture’s web site.
The math and design are not elegant, but the product
is, I think, very useful. One can produce charts with almost any
combination of eyepieces and use it to decide what eye pieces to
buy or which combinations of EP, Barlow and reducer are redundant.
Please feel free to use this template. Attribution
is good, as someone once said. If you can figure out better math
or better WORKS methods, please let me know. Collaboration is good,
too.
|
|